Suggestion of an Ideal Business Environment Appraisal Tool for Consensus Caring Homes Group

Introduction bingle of the characteristics of the present day systemal environment is its relish to change. It is therefore advisable for judicatures to ensure that they employ ideal analysis tools in evaluation their national and foreign military control environments (Teece, 2010). By so doing, they go forth be able to formulate and implement strategies that give enable them to successfully wade through these changes and maintain their relevance to the people or clients that they target. at that place atomic number 18 different environmental appraisal tools that displace be use in evaluating the internal and external environments of an shaping (Gazzola et al., 2011). Selection of these techniques is based on several factors, one of these being the aspects that the validation is interested in wise to(p) (Cadle et al., 2010). This paper suggests and justifies the most ideal environmental appraisal technique that bay window be used by Consensus feel for Homes Group, a charitable organisation that adds specialist improvements for adults with learnedness disabilities in Scotland, Wales and England.Proposed Environmental analytic thinking techniqueThe ideal analysis tool that pile be used by Consensus Caring Homes Group is grind away analysis. This technique evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats that characterise a line of products (Cadle et al., 2010). Strengths and weaknesses are internal aspects of the organisation, while opportunities and threats are elements of the external environment and break of the organisations control.Aspects that are experienceed when establishing strengths and weaknesses of an organisation include its financial capabilities, its physical resources, the efficaciousness of its workforce, quality of unattackables or works it offers to its clients and its organisational structure, among an early(a)(prenominal)s (Helms, 2010). On the other hand, factors of the external market that ca n be analysed by this framework include the clients trends, scotch conditions, demographics of the target markets, legislation and the rivalry in the industry, among others (Lussier, 2011). The reasons why this technique has been selected oer the other available analysis tools are discussed below.Justification of the selection of gussy up ApproachAccording to Cadle et al. (2010), this analysis is ideal for the strategical proposalning make for of an organisation, which Consensus Caring Homes Group intends to carry let out(p). On carrying out an effective and encompassing grind analysis, companies are able to evaluate the new ventures in which they can involve themselves and their capabilities to do so. They are likewise able to identify the changes to be made in order to reduce or eliminate the weaknesses and wangle the potential threats that they might face (Helms, 2010). This therefore enables organisations management teams to communicate the strategic adjustments that lead to be made.As opposed to many other frameworks, the SWOT analysis approach as earlier discussed analyses both the internal and external business environments. The PESTEL analysis framework, for instance, only provides an overview of the external environmental factors political, economic, social, technological and judicial affecting a certain organisation or industry (Cadle et al., 2010). It must(prenominal) therefore be combined with an internal analysis technique for an organisation to make an ideal decision on the strategic direction that can be taken. This is as well the case with techniques that only provide an internal environmental analysis like the VRIN framework which evaluates whether a certain resource of an organisation can provide it with a sustainable competitive advantage (Warner, 2010). This whatsis that is provided by the SWOT analysis gives it an edge because it guides how internal capabilities can be used in utilising opportunities and evading threats in the external business environment.The simplicity of the SWOT analysis approach also makes it ideal for analysis, especially if a right away strategic decision in the organisations has to be made. According to Cadle et al. (2010), anyone with a tidy understanding or knowledge of the business can carry out a SWOT analysis. The fact that it does non need a proud degree of specialisation to be used also makes it a cost-efficient approach because rather than hiring external specialists to carry out an environmental analysis, a staff member with vast knowledge of the organisation can be asked to carry it out (Helms, 2010).Even with the mentioned advantages of SWOT analysis over the other frameworks, several researchers have questioned its effectiveness. One of these disadvantages is that it does not weigh the elements listed as strengths, opportunities, weaknesses or threats according to their levels of significance (Helms, 2010). This makes it challenge for the impacts of these factors to be determined. The analysis has also face up criticism for being subject to bias, depending on the parties involved in carrying out the analysis (Cadle et al., 2010).Applicability of the SWOT analysis approach on Consensus Caring Homes GroupThis section bases on the SWOT analysis framework to highlight the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the Consensus Caring Homes Group. As the organisation intends to make strategic plans to improve its service delivery and position in the industry, this analysis get out be effective in guiding its decision making process.StrengthsThe organisation serves the elderly with a wide range of learning disabilities. These include mild, moderate and severe learning disabilities, Downs syndrome and autism spectrum conditions (Consensus, 2014a). This provides the elderly with such conditions with an all-inclusive palm plan for learning disabilities, eliminating the need for referrals.Staff members and volunteers are also high ly apply towards providing the much needed services for the elderly with learning disabilities. The superiority of their service quality earned the organisation recognition as the Specialist burster Provider of the Year in 2011s Health Investor Awards (Carehome.co.uk, 2014). This has created a nice reputation for the organisation, which enables it to attract more investors.The fact that Consensus Caring Homes Group has offices throughout Scotland, Wales and England makes it accessible to a wide range of people in need of its services (Consensus, 2014b). To the target groups, it shows its dedication towards serving them. Its premises are also located in areas that are accessible to transportation, making accessibility idle for caregivers and patients moving to and from the homes.The strategic partnerships that the organisation has formed with other primary care units and local anesthetic authorities within the United Kingdom also assures it of the agree it needs in accessing fun ds or alternative healthcare solutions for its patients (Carehome.co.uk, 2014).WeaknessesOne of the weaknesses or Consensus Caring Homes Group is that it has been in existence for only near 10 years since its inception in 2004 (Consensus, 2014a). Whereas it is endeavouring to strengthen its position, it lacks the experience that other organisations that have been in the industry for longer possess.The high dependence on the local government for funding is also a weakness for the organisation because in many cases, the funding is conditional. If it fails to meet the standards set by the local government, the funding whitethorn be cut.The organisation experiences occasional insufficiency of funds, which makes it challenging for it to compensate its workers and motivate them to deliver high quality services. This also contributes to a high turnover rate for employees.Some of the organisations premises have not been designed to sufficiently carter for people with other physical disabil ities. This makes it challenging for them to fire around or use some facilities when visiting these homes.OpportunitiesImprovement in service delivery by the organisation provides it with the opportunity of attracting more investors (Ordanini et al., 2011). This will reduce the funding challenges that it is currently facing.In addition to only dealing with learning disability issues for the elderly, the organisation can expand to also stop other health issues that affect the elderly rather than referring them to other facilities. This will enable them to effectively monitor the progress of their patients.The technological advancements and research breakthroughs that are being experienced in the field of mental healthcare provide the organisation with the opportunity of offering better diagnosis and remedies for the patients that it targets (Rosenberg et al., 2012).ThreatsAs aforementioned, the organisation heavily relies on funding from the local government. In case of a regime c hange, the changes that might take place in budgetary allocations may bring about a threat of reduction or endpoint of funding (Teece, 2010).A diminishing quality of service, especially during periods of insufficient funding, threatens the good reputation of the organisation (Ordanini et al., 2011). This not only repels patients from seeking its services, but also increases scepticism among investors and well wishers who fund its operations. Employees may also resign citing woeful remuneration, exposing the organisation to competition from other enterprises offering the same services.ConclusionA periodic appraisal or evaluation of internal and external business environments of an organisation is ideal for strategic planning. One of the widely used frameworks of analysis whish has been addressed in this paper is the SWOT analysis technique, which highlights the internal strengths and weaknesses, and the external opportunities and threats. Whereas it has several advantages over othe r analysis techniques, it also has a few shortcomings, which have been addressed. An example SWOT analysis that has been carried out on Consensus Caring Homes Group in this paper has listed most of the factors that it needs to consider before making a strategic decision regarding its performance.ReferencesCadle, J., Paul, D. & Turner. P. ?(2010). bank line Analysis Techniques 72 Essential Tools for Success. Chippenham BCS, The Chartered Institute.Carehome.co.uk. (2014). Care Homes Owned by Consensus info & Members. Online easy at http//www.carehome.co.uk/care_search_results.cfm/searchgroup/36151030CARB Accessed 21 November 2014.Consensus. (2014)a. Consensus Support Website What Support do we offerOnline Available at http//www.consensussupport.com/ Accessed 21 November 2014.Consensus (2014)b. The Consensus Support website Where are we locatedOnline Available at http//www.consensussupport.com/ Accessed 21 November 2014.Gazzola, P. et al. (2011). Enhancing environmental appraisal ef fectiveness Towards an understanding of internal context conditions in organisational learning. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2)183-204.Helms, M.M. &. Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysiswhere are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. daybook of Strategy and direction, 3(3) 215-51.Lussier, R. (2011). Management Fundamentals Concepts, Applications, Skill Development. Mason Cengage Learning.Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M. & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd-funding transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4)443-70.Rosenberg, L., Kottorp, A. & Nygard, L. (2012). Readiness for Technology Use With People With Dementia The Perspectives of substantial Others. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 31(4)510-30.Teece, D.J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long disgorge Planning, 43(2)172-94.Warner, A.G. (2010). Strategic Analysis and Choice A Structured Approach. Californ ia Business Expert Press.