Open Source vs Traditional Development Essays -- Essays Papers

slack Source vs traditionalistic DevelopmentIn the globe of technology today there is populate for every(prenominal) maven at every take aim of expertise. From our identified Gurus, to the just bought their first figurer newbie. Home computers are sometimes al most(prenominal) to easy to use. The old apothegm just enough rope to hang yourself comes to mind. Settings that modify the very mode the system looks, and blow overs bottom be changed with the simple click of the mouse. This power, which has been given to every train of user, is not from training, unless from improvements and advancements in the system, and application packet on the computer. This software package system package is in a constant state of development, improving on current features and adding new ones. out(a) of this regular and consistent update in technology have handsome m both theories and Ideas on how software should be developed and controlled. From corporate America, to college ca mpuses everyone has an estimation from one extreme to the new(prenominal). On one side the belief either software should be free and unresolved to all, and the other protecting software secrets akin a rabid curb dog. Of course, both sides believe the other is a fanatic with a recognize lack of sense. The real dividing melodic line is not actually the control and dissemination of the software itself, but the practice or ancestry code that creates it. That reference point code is the human exculpated text that defines what the software does, and looks like. From that a compiler converts it to a form utilise by the computer know as machine code. In this compiled dress it appears to be bump off garbage to the just person, even to most good deal considered to be computer professionals or gurus. to the highest degree software--at least on the tralatitious side--is distributed in its compiled form. The original intent of hoard was not to protect the consultat ion code, but this has been one benefit to the software developers. Since a computer can not read the opening code, a program is complied to render it to run on similar type of hardware without the requirement of special software to interpret it into machine code.The traditional and most common form of source code control today uses copyrights and the juridic system to protect it. Companies like Microsoft vigilantly protect their vital procure assets by utilizing the court systems any time it feels a threat from an distant source. An alternate form of source code co... ...continue to embrace the OSS movement it pass on in itself create an persistence with more competition, a higher level of standards, and more consumer choice. Closed software has proven to close the market and allow it to be controlled by a single monopoly. The monopolistic technology environs of today has created bloated applications and a complete void of choice for consumers. BibliographyStallman, R ichard (1998), Linux and the GNU Project. In Free Software backside On-Line. Avaialble http//www.fsf.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html Cooper, Charles (Friday, November 5, 1999), Microsoft judged a monopoly. In ZDNET On-Line. Avaialble http//macweek.zdnet.com/1999/10/31/monopoly.htmlOpen Resources (1999-06-17), Apache. In Open Resources/The Free Source On-Line. visible(prenominal) http//www.openresources.com/documents/halloween-1/node10.htmlOSI Open Source Intiative- (2000), knowledgeableness to Open Source. In opensource.org On-Line. addressable http//www.opensource.org/intro.htmlSteven, Eric (08/24/2000), Cathedral and the Bazaar/ plane section 1. In Cathedral and the Bazaar On-Line. Available http//www.tuxedo.org/esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ Open Source vs Traditional Development Essays -- Essays PapersOpen Source vs Traditional DevelopmentIn the world of technology today there is room for everyone at every level of expertise. From our identified Gurus, to the just bought their first computer newbie. Home computers are sometimes almost to easy to use. The old saying just enough rope to hang yourself comes to mind. Settings that modify the very way the system looks, and runs can be changed with the simple click of the mouse. This power, which has been given to every level of user, is not from training, but from improvements and advancements in the system, and application software on the computer. This software is in a constant state of development, improving on current features and adding new ones.Out of this regular and consistent update in technology have grown many theories and Ideas on how software should be developed and controlled. From corporate America, to college campuses everyone has an idea from one extreme to the other. On one side the belief all software should be free and open to all, and the other protecting software secrets like a rabid guard dog. Of course, both sides believe the other is a fanatic wi th a complete lack of sense. The real dividing line is not actually the control and distribution of the software itself, but the blueprint or source code that creates it. That source code is the human readable text that defines what the software does, and looks like. From that a compiler converts it to a form used by the computer know as machine code. In this compiled format it appears to be complete garbage to the average person, even to most people considered to be computer professionals or gurus. Most software--at least on the traditional side--is distributed in its compiled form. The original intent of compiling was not to protect the source code, but this has been one benefit to the software developers. Since a computer can not read the source code, a program is complied to allow it to run on similar type of hardware without the requirement of special software to interpret it into machine code.The traditional and most common form of source code control today uses copyrig hts and the judicial system to protect it. Companies like Microsoft vigilantly protect their vital copyrighted assets by utilizing the court systems any time it feels a threat from an outside source. An alternate form of source code co... ...continue to embrace the OSS movement it will in itself create an industry with more competition, a higher level of standards, and more consumer choice. Closed software has proven to close the market and allow it to be controlled by a single monopoly. The monopolistic technology environment of today has created bloated applications and a complete void of choice for consumers. BibliographyStallman, Richard (1998), Linux and the GNU Project. In Free Software Foundation On-Line. Avaialble http//www.fsf.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html Cooper, Charles (Friday, November 5, 1999), Microsoft judged a monopoly. In ZDNET On-Line. Avaialble http//macweek.zdnet.com/1999/10/31/monopoly.htmlOpen Resources (1999-06-17), Apache. In Open Resources/The Free Source On-Line. Available http//www.openresources.com/documents/halloween-1/node10.htmlOSI Open Source Intiative- (2000), Introduction to Open Source. In opensource.org On-Line. Available http//www.opensource.org/intro.htmlSteven, Eric (08/24/2000), Cathedral and the Bazaar/Section 1. In Cathedral and the Bazaar On-Line. Available http//www.tuxedo.org/esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/