Nature Vs Nurture Essay Topics

Nature Vs Nurture Essay TopicsNature vs. nurture essay topics are often at the center of debates about race and ethnicity in higher education. These two main debate points have been around for centuries, with people arguing about the role of nature versus nurture in the creation of a specific human being. The nature vs. nurture argument is both easy to understand and difficult to avoid because it appears in different forms in many different works.'Nature vs. nurture' refers to the question of whether or not there is any difference between how one person is made and how another person is made. For example, if you were looking at the Chinese culture, you might ask: What was the difference between the Chinese people who came from China and the Chinese people who stayed in China? When it comes to race and ethnicity, it is this same debate that is also used. People argue about what causes someone to be born a certain way, what causes someone to be born in a certain place, and how it is th at those in different places come together to form a nation.One of the arguments about race and ethnicity is that all of the various different variations are the result of the interactions between the genetics of an individual and the environment of the person. A Chinese person might have had a father who had a very light skin complexion, and this might create an advantage for the Chinese. Other variations could be caused by changes in the environment that are not inherited. However, there are also differences in the genetics of different people, and these would appear to create differences in the kind of behavior between races.Although there is some truth to the argument between nature vs. nurture, there is some controversy over the actual differences between the two. For example, in the recent debate between Rachel Dolezal and local NAACP officials about her choices about her ethnicity, one thing was clear. The NAACP officials did not believe that Rachel's racial identity was caus ed by her genetics, but instead by her experiences. Unfortunately, her experiences appear to be determined by her genes, which makes this case interesting because we cannot really find out what actually happened.At this point, some people have argued that you should be careful about the use of 'nature vs. nurture' essay topics, because it does not actually provide any real information for class discussions and essays. Instead, they say that students should use more generic terms for argumentation, such as race and ethnicity. This has become known as the 'nature vs. nurture argument,' and many people disagree with this.In reality, nature vs. nurture does not make sense for many kinds of argumentation because it lacks specific definitions. For example, if someone says, 'All people are genetically the same,' they are not defining anything. They are just saying that everyone is genetically the same. Although genetics can be a strong influence on a person's physical appearance, many argu e that this does not prove anything about how genes are related to race and ethnicity.The 'nature vs. nurture' debate can lead to arguments about how much specific variation exists between races and ethnicities. Since so many of the differences seem to be about the environment of a person, rather than being based on genetics, it is hard to tell what exactly is the difference between these two factors. Race and ethnicity are not different between individuals because of differences in genes, and this leads many to look at genetics and their influences as an explanation for race and ethnicity. While genetics can be an important influence on one's appearance, there is also the potential for a person to come from multiple ethnic backgrounds through natural means.While the debate over what is the cause of differences in ethnic groups is ongoing, we do know that some people don't base their opinion on genes, and others do. Regardless of the cause, however, the differences between races and ethnicities are not genetic, and therefore it would not be a good idea to take a biological argument and turn it into a political argument.